Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Obama, Seacrest, and our War against Indifference (Brian E. Konkol)

The following was published on the Sojourners' God's Politics blog on September 11, 2013, and can be found at

As President Obama prepared to address the nation and articulate a plan for military intervention in Syria, NBC rushed to assure its viewers that the Ryan Seacrest-hosted game show, “The Million Second Quiz”, would not be interrupted. As detailed by the National Broadcast Company,  the President would speak about the international conflict for only fifteen minutes, thus viewers could watch their televisions with full confidence that the entirely of the hyped-up program would be fully protected. While there was a great deal of suspense as to whether or not NBC would follow through on its promise of an unbroken telecast, the Presidential coverage stayed within the agreed upon time slot, viewers were able to watch their regularly scheduled program, and all was well in the world.
In the mean time, all is not well in the world. If there is such a thing as hell on earth, one could find it within the borders of Syria, as each day seems to be worse than the one that came before it. The state of affairs under President Bashar al-Assad continues to decline, and the loss of human life is beyond staggering. Since its recent civil war began, Syria has become dramatically fragmented and its national identity has all but disappeared. As a result, it would seem that citizens either align with the government or with the resistance, the Alawhites, the Sunni’s, or the Shiites, Aleppo residents, or Damascus dwellers. Through it all, according to the United Nations over 100,000 people have died, and due in part to the reluctance of foreign nations to fully intervene, it remains likely that death tolls – especially among women and children – will continue to rise for the foreseeable future.

While some in the U.S. are passionately committed to exploring peaceful methods of engagement in Syria, far too many are neutral in the face of injustice by way of disinterest and distraction, to the point that we would rather be privately entertained than publicly engaged. In what can be described as a heartbreaking state of affairs, instead of contributing to the international peace process on behalf of the most poor and vulnerable members of our global society, we seem to be far too drunk with distraction, diversion, and delusion. In other words, rather than loving our neighbors as we would wish to be loved ourselves, we make countless excuses not to care, and the result is an increased loss in life through dreadful acts of brutality. In many ways we seem to have forgotten who we are and lost track of what truly matters, for if we cannot come to the aid of the most vulnerable among us, then what do we stand for?

As President Obama continues to make the case for military strikes in Syria, and as the death tolls in the region continue to rise, perhaps the most important battle to be won is the fight against our collective indifference. In other words, as we consider how to engage, perhaps the most important point is to stay fully engaged, for the stakes are far too high, the costs of mistakes are far too deep, and the value of human life is beyond priceless. In the words of Elie Wiesel:

The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference.

As citizens of a global superpower we have the unique opportunity – and the sacred responsibility – to do what is required for peace in our world. And so, as we consider the full range of options surrounding intervention, the time is upon us to resist the temptation of isolation, as there is no greater priority than the process of peacemaking, the situation in Syria is not hopeless, and we in the United States are by no means helpless. There are far too many Syrians trying to survive in an earthly hell, and in the face of such gross injustices, neutrality and inaction cannot be acceptable options. The time is upon us to seek solutions and spark action, and the first enemy to conquer is not standing on foreign soil, but rather, it is the collective indifference that threatens to kill our souls. And so, may we meet this moment in time to engage fully for the sake of peace, not merely because we could, but because we can.